Keyword summary
46% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nondisclosure Agreements results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 837 hits . Analysis detected 5,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,980 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,194 of 37,536 keywords). This Nondisclosure Agreements is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group. Nondisclosure Agreements
Keyword details
Total words: 7,980
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.6% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst