Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,654 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nobel Prize In Physics results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,061 hits . Analysis detected 9,793 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,957 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (13,685 of 35,675 keywords). This Nobel Prize In Physics is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. Nobel Prize In Physics
Keyword details
Total words: 7,957
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.0% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst