Keyword summary
98%2 analyzed articles/videos468 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Rothman results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 2,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,949 of 37,536 keywords). This Noah Rothman is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Noah Rothman
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
82%Noah Rothman (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,404
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
5.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.6%4.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.2%18.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 14.0%14.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Composition/Division: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate