Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Reiner results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 1,560 hits. Analysis detected 8,497 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,184 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,565 of 37,536 keywords). This Nick Reiner is worse (more manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Nick Reiner
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Nick Reiner (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.5% percentile
3.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 25.2%25.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.6%6.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 25.2%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.5%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate