Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nick Fuentes results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 3,025 hits . Analysis detected 25,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,631 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,284 of 37,217 keywords). This Nick Fuentes is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Nick Fuentes
Keyword details
Total words: 12,631
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.4% percentile 4.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles12.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 18.1% 18.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.5% 20.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 23.9% 23.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst