Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Nfl Hall Of Fame results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 1,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,710 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Nfl Hall Of Fame is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Nfl Hall Of Fame
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Nfl Hall Of Fame (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,710
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos