Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,226 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Times Eeoc Countersuit results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Straw Man, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 879 hits. Analysis detected 6,056 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,904 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (31,147 of 37,536 keywords). This New York Times Eeoc Countersuit is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
New York Times Eeoc Countersuit
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,904
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510017.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 3.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Straw Man: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos