Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,164 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York City Politics results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,259 hits . Analysis detected 13,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,812 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,416 of 37,536 keywords). This New York City Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 64.30% of the peer group. New York City Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 8,812
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
64% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.3% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 6.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst