Keyword summary
42% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Species results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 854 hits . Analysis detected 6,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,899 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,668 of 37,536 keywords). This New Species is better (less manipulative) than 65.70% of the peer group. New Species
Keyword details
Total words: 7,899
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst