Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video533 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New Right results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 987 hits. Analysis detected 2,975 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,132 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (7,508 of 37,536 keywords). This New Right is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
New Right
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠80%New Right (selected)5%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,132
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

80% percentile
025507510080.0% percentile
5.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 46.3%46.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 46.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.0%Straw Man: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

How Liberals Misread MAGA⁠71%
Compact⁠77%By Gregory Conti⁠0%6/22/2026, 11:00:09 AM