Keyword summary
29%1 analyzed article/video1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nemours Children's Health results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 362 hits. Analysis detected 2,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 34% (36,494 of 55,059 keywords). This Nemours Children's Health is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Nemours Children's Health
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
34%Nemours Children's Health (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,888
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos