Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 377 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Diamond results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 891 hits . Analysis detected 3,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,716 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (20,852 of 37,536 keywords). This Neil Diamond is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. Neil Diamond
Keyword details
Total words: 4,716
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst