Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neanderthals results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 417 hits . Analysis detected 3,219 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,404 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,848 of 37,536 keywords). This Neanderthals is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Neanderthals
Keyword details
Total words: 4,404
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst