Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Security Law results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 1,662 hits. Analysis detected 6,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,684 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,322 of 37,536 keywords). This National Security Law is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the peer group.
National Security Law
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%National Security Law (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,684
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510083.2% percentile
5.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 45.1%45.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 15.3%15.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 45.1%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 29.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 1.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos