Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 491 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sherisse Pham results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 447 hits . Analysis detected 2,089 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.3% and a BS Rank of 89% (763 of 6,532 authors). This Sherisse Pham is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Sherisse Pham
Author details
Total words: 1,448
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.3% percentile 6.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.9% 30.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.0% 14.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 14.1% 14.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 7.6% 7.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.4% 8.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 30.9%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 25.9%, sitewide 26.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 14.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst