Keyword summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video940 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Historic Preservation Act results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 797 hits. Analysis detected 5,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (5,549 of 37,536 keywords). This National Historic Preservation Act is worse (more manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group.
National Historic Preservation Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠86%National Historic Preservation Act (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

85% percentile
025507510085.2% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.0%17.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 28.3%28.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 9.5%9.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos