Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,075 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Football League results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 1,371 hits. Analysis detected 8,201 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,656 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (23,733 of 37,536 keywords). This National Football League is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
National Football League
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 8,656
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510036.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 15.8%15.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos