Keyword summary
59% 1 analyzed article/video 931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Nakase results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 529 hits . Analysis detected 2,609 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (13,224 of 37,536 keywords). This Natalie Nakase is worse (more manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group. Natalie Nakase
Keyword details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 64.8% percentile 3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst