Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 768 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Narco Terrorism results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 49.7% saturation with 1,146 hits . Analysis detected 5,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,304 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,922 of 37,536 keywords). This Narco Terrorism is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Narco Terrorism
Keyword details
Total words: 2,304
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.9% percentile 10.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 49.7% 49.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 27.1% 27.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 30.2% 30.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 18.8% 18.8% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 26.9% 26.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 49.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 30.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 26.9%, sitewide 19.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 3.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 3.3% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst