Keyword summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Montana Public Service Commission results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 387 hits. Analysis detected 1,934 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,276 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (31,155 of 51,384 keywords). This Montana Public Service Commission is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group.
Montana Public Service Commission
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,276
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.4% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.8%11.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos