Keyword summary
0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monsanto results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,358 hits. Analysis detected 10,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,986 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,110 of 37,536 keywords). This Monsanto is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Monsanto
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
28%Monsanto (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.3%11.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate