Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,042 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monsanto results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,358 hits . Analysis detected 10,821 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,986 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,110 of 37,536 keywords). This Monsanto is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Monsanto
Keyword details
Total words: 10,986
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles11K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst