Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Will Stone results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 769 hits . Analysis detected 5,194 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,546 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 76% (1,613 of 6,628 authors). This Will Stone is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Will Stone
Author details
Total words: 3,546
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.7% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 19.0% 19.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 7.0% 7.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.9% 5.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 19.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 21.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% Begging the Question: Author 7.0%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Burden of Proof: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst