Keyword summary
90% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monica Lewinsky results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 1,085 hits . Analysis detected 9,036 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,648 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 80% (7,847 of 37,536 keywords). This Monica Lewinsky is worse (more manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group. Monica Lewinsky
Keyword details
Total words: 4,648
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.1% percentile 4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.3% 23.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 22.4% 22.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.3%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 22.4%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst