Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 892 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bianca Brosh results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 277 hits . Analysis detected 2,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,784 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,077 of 6,628 authors). This Bianca Brosh is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Bianca Brosh
Author details
Total words: 1,784
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.8% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.1% 9.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 15.5% 15.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.6% 12.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 8.0% 8.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 10.1% 10.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.5% 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 6.0% 6.0% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.9% 4.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 15.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 12.6%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 11.3%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.0%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Author 8.0%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 6.0%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Primacy Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst