Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos725 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Modern Love results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 590 hits. Analysis detected 5,179 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,860 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (33,837 of 36,446 keywords). This Modern Love is better (less manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Modern Love
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠8%Modern Love (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,860
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

7% percentile
02550751007.2% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos