Keyword summary
74%1 analyzed article/video453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mlb Trade Rumors results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 1,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,359 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,331 of 37,536 keywords). This Mlb Trade Rumors is worse (more manipulative) than 69.80% of the peer group.
Mlb Trade Rumors
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
70%Mlb Trade Rumors (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,359
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510069.8% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.2%9.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos