Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitchell Robinson results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,462 hits . Analysis detected 7,507 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,364 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 51% (18,568 of 37,536 keywords). This Mitchell Robinson is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group. Mitchell Robinson
Keyword details
Total words: 8,364
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.5% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst