Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos1,785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Highway Patrol results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 383 hits. Analysis detected 4,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,641 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (32,863 of 34,928 keywords). This Missouri Highway Patrol is better (less manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group.
Missouri Highway Patrol
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
6%Missouri Highway Patrol (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,641
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

6% percentile
02550751005.9% percentile
1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate