Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,278 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Missouri Budget results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,718 hits . Analysis detected 13,429 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,918 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (36,036 of 37,536 keywords). This Missouri Budget is better (less manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group. Missouri Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 19,918
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst