Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steph Quinn results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 467 hits . Analysis detected 3,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,704 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,498 of 6,360 authors). This Steph Quinn is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group. Steph Quinn
Author details
Total words: 6,704
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.0% 3.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Author 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Burden of Proof: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst