Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Misappropriation Of Public Funds results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 518 hits. Analysis detected 3,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,584 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠66% (13,056 of 37,536 keywords). This Misappropriation Of Public Funds is worse (more manipulative) than 65.20% of the peer group.
Misappropriation Of Public Funds
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,584
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

65% percentile
025507510065.2% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.5%18.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 12.4%12.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.1%20.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos