Keyword summary
11% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miracle On The Hudson results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 328 hits . Analysis detected 3,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,332 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,993 of 37,536 keywords). This Miracle On The Hudson is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Miracle On The Hudson
Keyword details
Total words: 6,332
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst