Keyword summary
64% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Ice Crackdown results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 1,080 hits . Analysis detected 7,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,047 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (21,188 of 35,675 keywords). This Minnesota Ice Crackdown is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group. Minnesota Ice Crackdown
Keyword details
Total words: 9,047
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.6% percentile 2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst