Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minneapolis St Paul results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 2,255 hits . Analysis detected 14,363 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,099 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (4,754 of 35,635 keywords). This Minneapolis St Paul is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Minneapolis St Paul
Keyword details
Total words: 6,099
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.7% percentile 6.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 37.0% 37.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.8% 27.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 37.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 9.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 3.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 4.6% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst