Keyword summary
2% 1 analyzed article/video 942 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minneapolis Park And Recreation Board results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 109 hits . Analysis detected 649 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,826 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (33,470 of 34,692 keywords). This Minneapolis Park And Recreation Board is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. Minneapolis Park And Recreation Board
Keyword details
Total words: 2,826
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.5% percentile 1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% No True Scotsman: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst