Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,209 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ming-Chi Kuo results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anchoring Bias, and Optimism Bias, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 709 hits. Analysis detected 5,729 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,836 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,938 of 37,536 keywords). This Ming-Chi Kuo is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Ming-Chi Kuo
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Ming-Chi Kuo (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,836
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.2% percentile
3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.4%2.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate