Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,360 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Military Trials results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 544 hits. Analysis detected 4,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,440 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (22,131 of 34,053 keywords). This Military Trials is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Military Trials
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Bastille Day1%
0%Radio Broadcasts1%
0%Metropolitan Opera1%
0%Borders1%
0%French Revolution1%
35%Military Trials (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,440
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

35% percentile
025507510035.0% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Red Herring: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos