Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Military Contracts results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Unattributed Quote , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 542 hits . Analysis detected 2,256 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Military Contracts is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Military Contracts
Keyword details
Total words: 1,476
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 36.7% 36.7% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 36.7%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 1.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Tu Quoque: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst