Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,270 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miguel Diaz-Canel results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,516 hits . Analysis detected 7,006 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,596 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (32,771 of 37,530 keywords). This Miguel Diaz-Canel is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group. Miguel Diaz-Canel
Keyword details
Total words: 10,596
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst