Keyword summary
ā 80% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Wolverines results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 1,279 hits . Analysis detected 14,075 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,848 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ā 30% (24,974 of 35,635 keywords). This Michigan Wolverines is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group. Michigan Wolverines
Keyword details
Total words: 13,848
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst