Keyword summary
50%2 analyzed articles/videos1,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michigan Legislature results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 595 hits. Analysis detected 3,920 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,340 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (37,488 of 49,594 keywords). This Michigan Legislature is better (less manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Michigan Legislature
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
25%Michigan Legislature (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 7,340
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.4% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos