Keyword summary
91%3 analyzed articles/videos1,401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Wolff results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 1,338 hits. Analysis detected 10,333 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,291 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,125 of 37,326 keywords). This Michael Wolff is worse (more manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group.
Michael Wolff
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
79%Michael Wolff (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,291
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510078.2% percentile
4.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 25.3%25.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 18.2%18.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 23.9%23.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate