Keyword summary
72%1 analyzed article/video1,635 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miatta Fahnbulleh results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 347 hits. Analysis detected 4,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,905 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,130 of 37,536 keywords). This Miatta Fahnbulleh is better (less manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Miatta Fahnbulleh
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
41%Miatta Fahnbulleh (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,905
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510041.0% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos

The great Net Zero showdown53%
UnHerd69%By John Rapley52%7/23/2026, 4:02:39 PM