Keyword summary
67% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Memorandum Of Understanding results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 924 hits . Analysis detected 7,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,607 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,196 of 37,536 keywords). This Memorandum Of Understanding is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. Memorandum Of Understanding
Keyword details
Total words: 7,607
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Representativeness Heuris… Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst