Keyword summary
79% 5 analyzed articles/videos 678 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melinda French Gates results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 1,124 hits . Analysis detected 9,226 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,612 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (22,799 of 34,563 keywords). This Melinda French Gates is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Melinda French Gates
Keyword details
Total words: 9,612
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst