Keyword summary
30%1 analyzed article/video1,530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Studies results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 270 hits. Analysis detected 2,018 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,590 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,331 of 37,536 keywords). This Medical Studies is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group.
Medical Studies
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
14%Medical Studies (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,590
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.9% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos