Keyword summary
75%3 analyzed articles/videos236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayor Michelle Wu results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 1,184 hits. Analysis detected 5,164 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,387 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,631 of 37,536 keywords). This Mayor Michelle Wu is better (less manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Mayor Michelle Wu
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Mayor Michelle Wu (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510037.0% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate