Keyword summary
54% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,608 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mayor Daniel Lurie results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 952 hits . Analysis detected 5,474 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,824 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (28,555 of 35,127 keywords). This Mayor Daniel Lurie is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Mayor Daniel Lurie
Keyword details
Total words: 7,824
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst