Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Devoti results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,177 hits . Analysis detected 9,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,757 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (24,649 of 34,832 keywords). This Matthew Devoti is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Matthew Devoti
Keyword details
Total words: 10,757
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst