Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,734 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Martha Mitchell results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 663 hits . Analysis detected 4,135 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,936 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (23,362 of 34,040 keywords). This Martha Mitchell is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group. Martha Mitchell
Keyword details
Total words: 6,936
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst